The Hot Young Supreme Court Justice PC Game Is Deeply Upsetting, and I Must Have It
A brief introduction to Supreme Courtship, a Kickstarter game that begins with Antonin Scalia getting poisoned on the steps of the Supreme Court building by Knockoff Carmen SanDiego.
Sometimes, the murky depths of the internet urp up something so cheerfully deranged that I am reduced to sitting silently in my chair, staring glassy-eyed into the middle distance, pondering the awesome breadth of the human experience and also worrying a little bit about whether I am having a stroke.
This is how my body reacted to encountering Supreme Courtship, a failed Kickstarter project from 2019, which nearly gave us a computer game that—I swear this is real—allows you, playing a character whose backstory includes a stint as the host of a courtroom TV show about adjudicating legal disputes between ghosts (???), to assume the role of America’s newly-appointed Supreme Court justice. Gameplay involves working alongside young, hot versions of real-life justices to hear oral arguments, decide big cases, and explore “what justice means in our society.” Here are your eight colleagues, rendered as the stars of an animated Real World spin-off that for some reason streams exclusively on the Frontier Airlines in-flight app.
Here is me, conducting a live TV interview about my judicial philosophy. Please note that the game does not allow for customization of outfits, although I admittedly owned every one of these items of clothing in 2011.
Along the way, players will also have the opportunity to—again, I am not making this up—solve the enduring mystery of who murdered their predecessor, the late Justice Antonin Scalia, by poisoning the whiskey he chugged from a flask while ascending the steps of the Supreme Court building in the middle of the night. Here is the climax of the game’s cinematic, borderline-hallucinogenic opening sequence, which portrays the nefarious assassin, Knockoff Carmen SanDiego, standing triumphantly over the prone body Scalia, who spent his last fictional moments on earth dressed like Homophobic Jack Webb in Dragnet.
Supreme Courtship’s developers describe the project as a “judicial friendship simulator” that centers “comedy, friendship, and experiencing life as a justice.” Among the characters you will get to know are John Roberts, the “cool and collected court dad”; Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the “feminist firebrand and master dissenter”; and Anthony Kennedy, who is described as both the Court’s “wily and temperamental swing vote,” and also as an “adorable twerp.”
In light of the credible sexual assault allegations against Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the developers explain that they made the difficult decision to exclude him from the Supreme Courtship extended universe altogether. This is both extremely funny as far as punishments go, and also ten times more significant a punishment than the real-life Kavanugh ever experienced.
As far as I can tell—at least, from the 15 minutes I was able to play the online demo of Supreme Courtship before I was rushed to the hospital because blood started pouring from my eyes—the other justices’ in-game personalities are a bit less developed. Process of elimination, however, indicates that these two are the avatars of Justices Samuel Alito and Stephen Breyer. I am not sure which is which; candidly, I am not sure what result would upset me more.
The game’s promo site feels like a time capsule from the “Notorious R.B.G.” era of Supreme Court pop culture crossover: There is the requisite glowing tribute to the cross-ideological friendship between Scalia and Ginsburg, for example, and the developers’ stated goal of creating a game to make the Court “not as scary as it is on the news” feels very quaint in light of, you know, the scary things that the Court is actually doing. On the one hand, a game that literally caricatures the politicians who use their positions of power to inflict a multitude of harms on vulnerable people feels trivializing and cringe. On the other hand, with S-tier merch like this available to early supporters, perhaps I will find a way to tolerate it.
According to Supreme Courtship’s Kickstarter page, the project ultimately raised $27,109, just short of its $32,000 fundraising goal. I have asked our lawyers to research whether IRS rules would allow a nonprofit media outlet like Balls & Strikes to write a check for the $4,891 balance, and will provide an update as soon as I have it.
(h/t @liberatepalestine.bsky.social)
As always, you can find everything we publish at ballsandstrikes.org, or follow us on Bluesky at @ballsandstrikes.org, or on Twitter at @ballsstrikes. You can get in touch by emailing contact@ballsandstrikes.org. Thanks for reading.
This Week In Balls & Strikes
The Supreme Court Is Making People Fight For Marriage Equality Again, Madiba Dennie
People don’t trust a post-Dobbs Supreme Court to protect their rights, so they’re trying to protect themselves.
The Right’s Assault On Free Speech Is Going to Get Worse, G.S. Hans
No matter who wins the election, the legal infrastructure Trump built will give the right plenty of opportunities to roll back the First Amendment’s protections for people they don’t like.
The Supreme Court’s Most Important Power Is Its Ability to Bullshit, Jay Willis
A week before the election, the justices signal that they are as willing as ever to meddle in democracy for the benefit of the Republican Party.
The Colossally Silly Claim That Ruth Bader Ginsburg “Agreed With Donald Trump’s Position On Abortion,” Explained, Madiba Dennie
One of the most persistent conservative talking points about Roe and abortion is based on a cynical misreading of the late justice’s comments.
Supreme Court Declines to Gut Agency That Prevents Consumer Products From Killing You, Madiba Dennie
For now, at least!
This Week In Other Stuff We Appreciated
How the Supreme Court Case On Trans Youth Could Affect Health Care For All Americans, Orion Rummler, The 19th/Them
The stakes in United States v. Skrmetti are even higher than most Americans realize.
Biden Has Done Great With Judges—But the Election Looms Over the Courts, Chris Geidner, Law Dork
A look ahead to the judicial confirmations landscape as of January 2025.