How Many Coup-Adjacent Flags Can One Supreme Court Justice Possibly Have??
Truly, I could not be more sorry for how much Sam Alito content is in this newsletter.
On Wednesday, The New York Times reported on the display of a notably coup-adjacent flag outside a home owned by Justice Samuel Alito. For at least several months last year, the “Appeal to Heaven” flag, a symbol popular among right-wing religious activists and/or January 6 insurrectionists, flew above the Alito family beach house in New Jersey. It appeared just above flags for Long Beach Island, where Alito’s home is located, and his beloved Philadelphia Phillies, a mostly-fun franchise that frankly should not have to deal with this bullshit.
This revelation should not be confused with the Times’s reporting last week on a different coup-adjacent flag, which flew outside a different Alito family home for a period of time in 2021. If there is a flagpole on the premises, this man is apparently incapable of not using it to align himself with people who have a more-than-passing interest in violently overthrowing the government.
As the Times points out, this timeline means the flag—the “Appeal to Heaven” flag, not the other one—was in front of the Alitos’ home as the Supreme Court was taking up legal challenges to criminal prosecutions of January 6 rioters, which the justices will decide sometime in the next few months. As any legal ethics expert will attest, if you are a sitting federal judge, nothing demonstrates your commitment to impartiality quite like using tacky seasonal home decor to signal your deepest sympathies for one of the parties before you.
When the Times asked Alito about the last “Stop the Steal” flag incident, the justice blamed his wife, Martha-Ann, explaining that she’d elected to fly the upside-down American flag during the course of a neighborhood squabble over the 2020 election, and that he had “no involvement whatsoever” in deciding to do so. In the week since, Alito has apparently concluded that it is better to say nothing at all than to tell the least believable story imaginable, because this time, he declined to respond to questions altogether.
The Times did, however, note that it confirmed the story with six other residents, who asked not to be identified “because they didn’t want to antagonize a longtime neighbor.” Presumably, this is especially true when said longtime neighbor is a reactionary creep who thinks the MyPillow guy has some pretty good ideas, if you think about it.
As always, you can find everything we publish at ballsandstrikes.org, or follow us on Twitter at @ballsstrikes, or get in touch by emailing contact@ballsandstrikes.org. Thanks for reading. Enjoy the long weekend.
This Week In Balls & Strikes
Sam Alito Is Running Out Of Ways to Show His Contempt For Democracy, Madiba Dennie
The Court’s six conservative justices just made it even harder for voters to protect themselves from illegal gerrymanders.
How the Supreme Court Abuses a Fake “Principle” to Put the Squeeze On Democracy, Ian Baize
The Purcell principle is supposed to prevent “voter confusion.” It…doesn’t do that.
Sam Alito Has Done Nothing to Earn the Benefit oOf the Doubt, Madiba Dennie
Again, I’m sorry! I wish we were writing less about him, too!
The “Originalist” Justices Keep Getting History Spectacularly Wrong, Madiba Dennie
Actual subject matter experts are baffled at how badly the conservative justices are butchering history in pursuit of their preferred policy outcomes.
This Week In Other Stuff We Appreciated
A Federal Judge Just Called Out the Supreme Court, Matt Ford, The New Republic
Carlton Reeves did not pull any punches in criticizing qualified immunity—and demanding that the justices finally do something about it.
Justice Alito Is a True Believer, Jamelle Bouie, The New York Times
“There is every reason, and then some, to think that Alito believes many of the same things that any other Republican of his age and ideological disposition might also believe.”
This Week In Obscure Photos of Supreme Court Justices On Getty Images
