"...leaving advocacy to the attorneys and testimony to the witnesses, expert and otherwise,” she says."
Say what? Law school degree implies skills at advocacy? Doesn't even imply competence in legal theory. And judges are now deciding rights? Who gave them the authority? Judicial review is not an implied power, which John Marshall knew when he assumed what he was trying to prove. But John Roberts doesn't know this, instead thinking judicial review is an implied power.
Jury nullification is constitutional.
Judicial review is judicial nullification, which is not constitutional.
In any case, the 9th circuit fell on its sword again.
"...leaving advocacy to the attorneys and testimony to the witnesses, expert and otherwise,” she says."
Say what? Law school degree implies skills at advocacy? Doesn't even imply competence in legal theory. And judges are now deciding rights? Who gave them the authority? Judicial review is not an implied power, which John Marshall knew when he assumed what he was trying to prove. But John Roberts doesn't know this, instead thinking judicial review is an implied power.
Jury nullification is constitutional.
Judicial review is judicial nullification, which is not constitutional.
In any case, the 9th circuit fell on its sword again.
Huuuuuge ego And a young fellow with not that long of a legal career, Hohum yawn.
😆👏🏻